What destroys an old bike club quickest, too many newer uninteresting bikes there just to keep the numbers up, or not enough older bikes and riders due to Old father Time?
Well . . .
The former changes and undermines the ethos, no doubt about that at all Rex.
But the latter is an existential threat!
Neither is good, I agree totally.
What we
really need is more younger people on old machinery. So easily said.
But it's quite some Ask given the knowledge, facilities and skills gaps, and the tendency of younger folk quite naturally to want things they couldn't have when
they were starting out, like us with our own choices from days of our youth.
I only know a small handful of people in their 20s and 30s with what we would count as older machinery.
We know they're just fantastic people - but their contemporaries think they're seriously weird!
When
Classic Bike started publishing in 1978, I was 23. I had a 'classic' as my sole daily transport in London, but it was only 2 years older than me. (Funnily enough, it still is and I still have it).
What if I were 23 today, and had a 25 year old machine . . .??
Oh, I do, I have a . . . Japawuki.
A being from another galaxy might inquire "Why do you human people think a tired '53 AMC twin was a 'classic' in '78, but an '00 japawuki isn't in 2026?"
We know instintively why it isn't / can't be, and we ensure that these things remain so because we have the power to define them. For now! It can only go in one direction though, I reckon.