Author Topic: Twittering Silencers?  (Read 2469 times)

Offline alanp

  • Plymouth, Devon
  • Valued Contributor
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 473
  • Karma: 7
Twittering Silencers?
« on: 19.06. 2011 14:43 »
Does anyone know who sells Goldie type silencers which twitter?
I know of 4 different silencer internals in Goldie silencers and from experimenting with two of them on two 500 singles, one twittered and the other didn't,
We have been discussing this in Chat & Diverse topic Rocket Gold Star if you want to catch up.
Cheers
Alan
Member of the 'Last of the Summer Wine Club - Jennycliff'.

Online bsa-bill

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 5413
  • Karma: 61
Re: Twittering Silencers?
« Reply #1 on: 19.06. 2011 15:57 »
From another thread Alan

Quote
Mine don't and it's almost  RGS engine spec.
I was told by a Goldie owner the twitter is down to valve overlap on the single, doesn't appear the same on a twin
All the best - Bill
1961 Flash - stock, reliable, steady, fantastic for shopping
1959 Rocket Gold Flash - blinged and tarted up  would have seizure if taken to  Tesco

Offline townsends20

  • A's Best Friend
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 58
  • Karma: 1
Re: Twittering Silencers?
« Reply #2 on: 19.06. 2011 17:35 »
A few years ago a friend of mine decided to tune his goldie by opening out the inlet port on doing so filed down the step inside, guess what! no more twitter and it never went the same after.   
          steve.
1962 rgs

Online Triton Thrasher

  • Scotland
  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 1478
  • Karma: 20
Re: Twittering Silencers?
« Reply #3 on: 19.06. 2011 18:00 »
A few years ago a friend of mine decided to tune his goldie by opening out the inlet port on doing so filed down the step inside, guess what! no more twitter and it never went the same after.   
          steve.

Some genius who rationally deduced that it was under-tuned and required to be "ported."

Online groily

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 1060
  • Karma: 17
    • www.brightsparkmagnetos.com
Re: Twittering Silencers?
« Reply #4 on: 19.06. 2011 18:33 »
Give a bloke a Dremel for Christmas - and the next owner is guaranteed years of fun discovering where he had his wicked way . . .
Bill

Offline townsends20

  • A's Best Friend
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 58
  • Karma: 1
Re: Twittering Silencers?
« Reply #5 on: 19.06. 2011 21:57 »
yep someone should have re-ported him! *sad2*
1962 rgs

Online chaterlea25

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 3175
  • Karma: 45
Re: Twittering Silencers?
« Reply #6 on: 19.06. 2011 22:02 »
Hi ALL,
The Stainless "goldie" type silencer on my SR came from Armours, Its like a songbird! *smile*

On the "tuning" escapades on Gold Stars, I was recently told by a reliable source, that increasing the inlet port on a big fin ( DBD)  only slowed the bike  ???? ????
His reasoning is that the 1 1/2in. carb is actually too big for the engine, ???? ????
Opening up the port further actualls slows the gas speed, and undoes the turbulence caused by the lip??

Cheers
John
1961 Super Rocket
1963 RGS (ongoing)

Offline alanp

  • Plymouth, Devon
  • Valued Contributor
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 473
  • Karma: 7
Re: Twittering Silencers?
« Reply #7 on: 20.06. 2011 09:04 »
Hi ALL,
The Stainless "goldie" type silencer on my SR came from Armours, Its like a songbird! *smile*

On the "tuning" escapades on Gold Stars, I was recently told by a reliable source, that increasing the inlet port on a big fin ( DBD)  only slowed the bike  ???? ????
His reasoning is that the 1 1/2in. carb is actually too big for the engine, ???? ????
Opening up the port further actualls slows the gas speed, and undoes the turbulence caused by the lip??
Thanks for the Armours information.
The Gold Star 1 1/2" GP carb and appropriate matching inlet port and valves were there to provide good cylinder filling at high revs on the DB34GS and DBD34GS, a job which it did well. The downside is that at lower revs the intake air speed is not optimised for good cylinder filling and hence torque at the lower end of the rev range was sacrificed. However, for the purpose it was developed, i.e. clubman racing, it was ideal. For scrambling, where good bottom end torque is/was required, the head is different with a smaller bore carb, inlet port and valve. Carbs of 1 1/8" and 1 5/32" were fitted to 1955 and 1956 DB34/DBD34GS scrambles spec engines which produce a higher air speed at lower revs for good bottom end filling, which incidentally is ideal for coping with modern city traffic conditions.
The RRT2 gearbox ratios for the clubman version were designed to keep the engine revs in the optimum torque range since a standard box lets the revs drop too far out of the 'fat' part of the torque curve, but can be a real pain in city traffic combined with a big GP carb..
As far as the turbulence caused by the lip is concerned, there should not be a lip. If someone has a lip then the head is not correct for the carb bore. It's either a modern poor quality repro head which are around or someone has been mucking about with a scrambles head or more likely someone has fitted a 1 1/2" GP carb on a pre 1956 head e.g. the CB34GS had either a 1 3/16" TT carb or 1 7/32" GP carb. Those heads were not cast to suit 1 1/2" bore carbs.
On the open road bikes like Bonnevilles and RGSs will initially leave the Goldie behind but they are usually pulled back in when the Goldie gets in its stride with revs in the upper reaches of the rev counter and can sustain it as long as you like, while the others are wondering about holing their pistons.
Boy, have our crowd seen a lot of Triumph pistons with holes in the top!
Alan
Member of the 'Last of the Summer Wine Club - Jennycliff'.

Offline wilko

  • Resident Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 681
  • Karma: 4
Re: Twittering Silencers?
« Reply #8 on: 20.06. 2011 19:07 »
There goes the stepped port myth then!!

Online chaterlea25

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 3175
  • Karma: 45
Re: Twittering Silencers?
« Reply #9 on: 20.06. 2011 21:38 »
Hi Alan and All,
My source is a well known and respected "goldie" guy. He makes his living from them, rebuilding engines and building "New" ones. He machines all his own castings and supplies the trade as well!
He had a load of new heads and cylinders in production when I was in his workshop
He has repaired a B33 alternator bottom end for one of my customers bike, it broke the crankpin and damaged the flywheels *sad2*
I was relaying his words

Regards
John
1961 Super Rocket
1963 RGS (ongoing)

Offline cus

  • Valued Contributor
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 305
  • Karma: 4
Re: Twittering Silencers?
« Reply #10 on: 21.06. 2011 00:09 »
G'day Everyone,
Hopefully not too much off topic, & more for Australian readers,
does anyone know what the law is regarding exhaust noise.
Harley's go past my place costantly, & shake the glasses,
most of them run straight thru pipes, I'm thinking of keeping
my '63 straight thru, it's loud, but not nearly as loud as the Harley's.
Do they measure it with a noise metre at rego check?

regards, Cus
56 G/Flash project

Offline Brian

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 1701
  • Karma: 40
  • Mt Gambier, South Australia.
Re: Twittering Silencers?
« Reply #11 on: 21.06. 2011 00:25 »
I guess the laws are different in every state but when it comes to bikes I work on the theory, and I suspect Muskrat also lives by this theory, it aint illegal until you get caught !

If you stick to country roads and dont go flogging up and down the main street you should be right. If you are subject to yearly inspections you will be made to fit mufflers. If you intend to ride any distance you will need mufflers, a bit of noise might be fun for a quick flog but after some time on a trip it gets really annoying.

There is a big difference between a bike that sounds nice and one thats just plain loud.

Offline Flatboy 1950

  • A's Best Friend
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 110
  • Karma: 1
    • Flat Earth Spares
Re: Twittering Silencers?
« Reply #12 on: 21.06. 2011 05:40 »
Years ago I had a Ducati SS Darmah & had a 2 into 1 exhaust system made leading into a Goldie style "silencer".
The stainless steel silencer was locally made to a Goldie drawing.
Wow !! That "silencer" was in fact an amplifier .... twittered beautifully , could raise the dead & certainly focussed the attention of the traffic cops on me ... Big Time !!!

Regards , Flatboy

Offline muskrat

  • Global Moderator
  • Wise & Enlightened
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 8160
  • Karma: 106
  • Lake Conjola NSW Oz
    • Shoalhaven Classic Motorcycle Club Inc
Re: Twittering Silencers?
« Reply #13 on: 21.06. 2011 08:11 »
G'day Cus,
              Yep Brian got it in one.
Down here it's 85db at 10 meters at 45 degrees I think (my wife farts louder). 95db for racing. Most people (police) expect old bikes to be a little loud. None of my bikes have baffles, but I'm the local classic bike inspector  ;)
Cheers
'51 A7 plunger, '57 A7SS now A10CR,  '83 CB1100F, 88 FXST .
Australia
Muskys Plunger A7

Offline alanp

  • Plymouth, Devon
  • Valued Contributor
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 473
  • Karma: 7
Re: Twittering Silencers?
« Reply #14 on: 21.06. 2011 08:16 »
Hi Alan and All,
My source is a well known and respected "goldie" guy. He makes his living from them, rebuilding engines and building "New" ones. He machines all his own castings and supplies the trade as well!
He had a load of new heads and cylinders in production when I was in his workshop
He has repaired a B33 alternator bottom end for one of my customers bike, it broke the crankpin and damaged the flywheels *sad2*
I was relaying his words
Regards
John

Understood John. I bought one of those modern cast heads and it left a lot to be desired not to mention re-machining in 3 different places and it eventually dropped an exhaust valve seat. Come back BSA all is forgiven.
Cheers
Alan
Member of the 'Last of the Summer Wine Club - Jennycliff'.