Author Topic: Big journal conrod  (Read 516 times)

Online Klaus

  • Valued Contributor
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Posts: 439
  • Karma: 10
Big journal conrod
« on: 08.09. 2015 08:57 »
Hi gents, does anybody know the diameter with toleances of the bore from a big journal conrod? I mean the bore without the shells.
Hayns tell the figures  for conneting rod big-end eye diameter 1.4610 - 1.4615 inch. But it is for small journal.

cheers Klaus


If you think, everything is under control, you are not fast enought.

BSA DB34 Goldstar, BSA A10 Road Rocked, BSA A7 Shooting Star, BSA M33, BSA M24, Kawa W650

Offline Viking

  • A's Good Friend
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2015
  • Posts: 128
  • Karma: 2
Re: Big journal conrod
« Reply #1 on: 09.09. 2015 12:15 »
I think the answer is here:

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/bsa/conversations/topics/13582

BSA service sheet No. 207, October 1948, re-printed May 1955.
 
Engine nos. XA7 - 101 to 600; first re-grind 1.4600 to 1.4595, with a
 0.065/0.060 face radius both sides. No second re-grind.
 Engine nos. XA7 601 upwards and A10 models; three re-grind possibilities.
 1.4495 to 1.4500; then 1.4400 to 1.4395; then 1.4300 to 1.4295.
 More information from that service sheet; Note that certain engines will be
 found to have the left-hand connecting rod drilled to improve lubrication
 ......
 

BSA service sheet No. 207, October 1948, revised January 1958.
 
As above, but also data for the large journal crankshaft;
 1.677/1.6765 with 0.120/0.115 face radius; 1.667/1.6665; and 1.657/1.6565
 (10, 20 & 30 thou undersizes).
 
 

Offline duTch

  • Ricketty Rocketty Golden Flashback
  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 4528
  • Karma: 41
Re: Big journal conrod
« Reply #2 on: 09.09. 2015 12:48 »

 I don't think that's correct, going on those engine numbers for starters, and unless I'm reading it wrong they're small journal regrind sizes anyway...I'm fairly sure I have that noted somewhere, give me ten minutes or so...
   
Quote
I mean the bore without the shells.


 edit- Ten minutes or so later...can't find the exact info just now, but measured a couple of old rods and they're in the vicinity of 1.8425"...notebook'll be in the last place I left it.

 I bought new rods and have the specs on them somewhere too.
Started building in about 1977/8 a on average '52 A10 -built from bits 'n pieces never resto intended -maybe 'personalised'
Have a '74 850T Moto Guzzi since '92-best thing I ever bought doesn't need a kickstart 'cos it bump starts sooooooooo(mostly) easy
Australia