Author Topic: new stainless exhaust  (Read 3263 times)

Offline coater87

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 1211
  • Karma: 6
new stainless exhaust
« on: 03.05. 2018 10:32 »
 I am installing a new stainless dual exhaust from armours.

 The fit is nowhere near the greatest, and it looks like my kicker pedal will foul the exhaust anyway.

 I dont think its a valid idea to send this back, because I do want a stainless system (my shed eats chrome and any metal that is not painted inside a year).

 So I am looking for ideas on how to tweak these pipes without kinking them.

 Also, the kicker. I bought this a few years ago from SRM, and I take it I need one thats cranked out further?

 Lee

 
Central Wisconsin in the U.S.

Online Billybream

  • Resident Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 738
  • Karma: 8
Re: new stainless exhaust
« Reply #1 on: 03.05. 2018 12:25 »
I would assemble loose and push the front engine stud through to the primary side and see if you can tweak the down pipe mounting bracket or slot the fixing hole.
The silencer bracket will also give alittle adjustment afixing  to the rear footrest.
As you state the kick start might be the culprit and that will be difficult to amend.
1960 Super Rocket, owned since 1966, back on the road 2012 after being laid up for 29yrs.

Offline Black Sheep

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2017
  • Posts: 1293
  • Karma: 10
    • Where black sheep live
Re: new stainless exhaust
« Reply #2 on: 03.05. 2018 14:27 »
Have you considered a dehumidifier for your shed? Can make a difference. I have Armours stainless exhausts on my bikes. They do require a bit (not usually much) guddling to fit but are worth the hassle.
2 twins, 2 singles, lots of sheep

Offline A10 JWO

  • Resident Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 730
  • Karma: 2
Re: new stainless exhaust
« Reply #3 on: 03.05. 2018 17:41 »
I have just fitted a complete Armours set, no issues and well made.

Offline chaterlea25

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 4458
  • Karma: 56
Re: new stainless exhaust
« Reply #4 on: 03.05. 2018 18:14 »
Hi Lee,
Quote
So I am looking for ideas on how to tweak these pipes without kinking them.

I had a lot of work to get the siamise stainless setup to fit my SR *work*

The good thing about stainless is that you can re polish it after heating and tweaking the pipes
Spot heating one side of the pipe with an oxy torch will bend the pipe noticably,
doing this in a few places / times can help a lot
I also had to put a hacksaw cut 3/4 ways through the pipe and reweld and polish to get it in line with the silencer as the pipe was hitting the frame  *eek*
I had t o use a roller pipe expander (used to expand boiler tubes) to get the pipes round and tight in the head

Watch Keith Fenner straightening marine prop shafts on youtube to see how effective the heat and quench method can be

John
1961 Super Rocket
1963 RGS (ongoing)

Offline bsa-bill

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 5715
  • Karma: 67
Re: new stainless exhaust
« Reply #5 on: 03.05. 2018 19:12 »
Quote
and it looks like my kicker pedal will foul the exhaust anyway

Pretty common comment with any of the 58 - 61 models with torpedo shaped exhausts I think, If anybody knows any firm selling kickstart lever with greater crank I'd appreciate A nod in that direction.
It's possible of course to use spacers to cure the problem and end up with pipes at very unequal distance from centre at the rear wheel, does it matter, not at all when riding of course, just nags at our sense of design perhaps ( ha - what a pretentious old fart Iv'e become)
All the best - Bill
1961 Flash - stock, reliable, steady, fantastic for shopping
1959 Rocket Gold Flash - blinged and tarted up  would have seizure if taken to  Tesco

Offline morris

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 1788
  • Karma: 28
  • Antwerp, Belgium
Re: new stainless exhaust
« Reply #6 on: 03.05. 2018 20:28 »

 Also, the kicker. I bought this a few years ago from SRM, and I take it I need one thats cranked out further?

 Lee

Heat it red hot and bend it. I did that to mine and it came out really well. No guarantee of course but I think if its a good quality one it should work.
'58 BSA A 10 SA
'52 BSA A 10 Plunger
'55 MORRIS ISIS
The world looks better from a motorbike
Belgium

Offline coater87

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 1211
  • Karma: 6
Re: new stainless exhaust
« Reply #7 on: 03.05. 2018 21:11 »
 First, is my "shed"....its literally falling down around my ears. The city zoning won't let me build a garage, and I am afraid they won't let me build a new shed if my current shed falls down.
 Old cinder block building with a tin roof, squirrels can go in and out with ease, when it rains it's damp in there for a week.

 The pipes (or the bike) are way off. Not as far as Johns were, but probably 1.5 inches low and pinched in 1 inch at the muffler join. Even twisting the mount didn't get me much closer.

 I am going to try the heat straighten. I just cannot get enough leverage to dowel bend it with heat. When (if) I get the pipes right, I will get my original kicker re-chromed and the pipes polished.

 I will keep you informed.

 Lee
Central Wisconsin in the U.S.

Offline Sluggo

  • Serial Hoarder, or Eccentric Collector depending on viewpoint
  • Resident Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2017
  • Posts: 654
  • Karma: 11
Re: new stainless exhaust
« Reply #8 on: 03.05. 2018 21:56 »
Lee, this is quite common on Notrun Commando's.  Many years ago, a friend & I did a parts survey with 10+ cylinder heads. Gordy and I both used to work for a Aerospace casting company and he theorized there was significant core shift on many of the castings. Surveying cylinder heads you could see the evolution of many.
Dies and molds are expensive, Gordy is a Tool & Die maker so he is an authority on this topic.

We found significant differences in the heads in the exhaust ports alone and accounted for major differences in how the pipes fit as well as aligned.  I only have 3 cast iron heads and 4 alloy ones for BSA Preunit twins and not enough to have a scientific comparison but I spent some time "eye balling" mine and believe there is variations in the ally ones, the cast iron ones look more consistent but I cant be sure at this point.

(To test, mark and measure a precision surface plate, then install a very LONG piece of tubing in each one at a time using a fixed mount, longer the better. We used a surveyors/construction laser to measure with,)

Point is, I suspect the reason SOME people have no issue and others do is that there is a disparity in castings, followed by engine mounts, frames, brackets etc.  As they say in construction, You may be off only an 1/8th of an inch here, but at the end you will be off by 2 ft.  (Accumulative)

I have some railroad construction tools (6 to 8 foot long) steel bars of various styles and made some sleeves for various OD & ID and use them in a fixture for gentle persuasion, and a torch in others.

As to your construction debacle, talk to some contractors.  One of my former co-workers had a portfolio of properties and had the same issue in one small town.  Had a bit of a dispute with the officials. But in his opinion any barriers you place in front of him are merely obstacles to navigate.   In his case the rules always have a loophole.  He found like you, they wouldnt approve a new structure but no one can restrict maintenance of the existing one.  (Well they can, but its hard to limit the scope).
So what he did was rebuilt his one small section at a time and over a period of time.  In his case it was limited to so many square feet so he rebuilt section by section just under that sizing.  When a major feature had to be left in place he either built over it, or behind it.  Code compliance spent months monitoring him but over time he rebuilt the entire house.   I bet your locals know of some tricks and ways to beat the system. 
Remember that any advice received on a free internet forum is generally worth about 1/2 of what you paid for it.
We overcharge every 3rd customer to pass the savings onto you.
You can have High Quality, Low price, and fast turnaround. Pick any 2, Never all 3 at the same time.

Offline Black Sheep

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2017
  • Posts: 1293
  • Karma: 10
    • Where black sheep live
Re: new stainless exhaust
« Reply #9 on: 03.05. 2018 22:42 »
When we bought our place we had to live in the shed for a while. Old stone walls, tin roof, no door. Massive condensation not to mention draughts. After the first winter I removed the tin roof a section at a time, installed timber sarking and roofing felt and then replaced the 50 year old tin roof. Added doors, fixed the windows. What a difference. Now quite a reasonable place to keep bikes, no more condensation dripping from every metal surface. I do run the dehumidifier in the worst conditions. Oh, the house is reasonably habitable so we live in there now.   
2 twins, 2 singles, lots of sheep

Offline coater87

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 1211
  • Karma: 6
Re: new stainless exhaust
« Reply #10 on: 01.06. 2018 13:56 »
 This is going to be picture and word heavy.

 I have been heating, bending, and straightening this exhaust. I almost clear everything, the original kicker clears the muffler.

 The rear brake petal clears the pipe, the left foot rest almost touches the pipe, the original center stand bangs into the muffler, and my side stand also hits the pipe, but I am much, much closer than I was.

 I bought what I thought was the correct muffler bracket (I dont remember from who, one of the usual suspects).

 After trying to hang the exhaust, I realized there was no way that was the right bracket (at least I hope not). So I made a much longer one, and that seemed to help. Can anyone give me an actual measure on a correct bracket for a 1958 swing arm a10?

 Also, could you look over the pictures I post for any obvious things wrong? For a while I was doubting my foot rests even. I have to get this exhaust finished, the job is starting to drag.
Central Wisconsin in the U.S.

Offline coater87

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 1211
  • Karma: 6
Re: new stainless exhaust
« Reply #11 on: 01.06. 2018 15:33 »
 Than here is right side.

 I am not a big fan of where it "wants" to be, boot is going to get pretty warm.
Central Wisconsin in the U.S.

Offline chaterlea25

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 4458
  • Karma: 56
Re: new stainless exhaust
« Reply #12 on: 01.06. 2018 19:21 »
Hi Lee,
I hope this won't upset you too much *sad2*
The footrest fitted on the left is a right hand one, it fits"above the bolt"
They fitted non symmetrical footrests on the earlier models
I cannot be sure when they went from one straight and one offset (to the bolt) to two offset footrests?
(parts book needs checking?) but the 61 has two offset footrests so the pipes can run higher
I loaned my late model parts book to a friend yesterday he has just bought a 59 reg but 60 model
A spark plug socket is what I use to reach the nuts on the offset footrests

John
1961 Super Rocket
1963 RGS (ongoing)

Offline coater87

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 1211
  • Karma: 6
Re: new stainless exhaust
« Reply #13 on: 01.06. 2018 20:42 »
 John,

 Be upset?  Absolutely not, I know something is bad wrong here- I just dont know what *ex*

 The parts book I am going by is the one we have online here that says "circa" 1958, and I think that might be a Gold Star frame?

 If I take both foot pegs back off, can you tell me if I have a correct set, or which one is right (if either) for this bike?

Lee
Central Wisconsin in the U.S.

Offline coater87

  • Wise & Enlightened
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 1211
  • Karma: 6
Re: new stainless exhaust
« Reply #14 on: 01.06. 2018 21:11 »
Here is what i have for a 1958 swing arm bike.
 The mounting lug in the picture measures 2.5 inches the way I measured it, the one behind the primary measures 3.5.
Central Wisconsin in the U.S.